Following a tradition initiated last year with the Torino Conference, selected papers<\/strong> focusing on the main topic of the STOREP 2016 Conference<\/strong> will be published in a sub-issue of History of Economic Ideas.<\/em><\/p>\n The sub-issue will deal with how economies evolve and change through <\/strong>time<\/strong>. Adopting an We therefore invite participants in the conference to submit their papers for the sub-issue<\/strong>. It is to be noted that papers presented at the conference are not per se considered for the sub-issue. Full papers must reach the STOREP 2015 Conference organizing committee (segretario@storep.org<\/a><\/strong>, email subject: \u201cSTOREP 2016 Conference Sub-Issue<\/strong>\u201d) by September 15, 2015<\/strong>.<\/p>\n (Anonymous<\/strong>) papers must be provided in Microsoft word<\/strong> or similar word processor (but not in pdf format); authors must indicate in a separate cover name, affiliation and e-mail address. Articles should be written in standard English<\/strong> (a native English speaker should revise the paper, the case being, before submission) and should not normally exceed 12,000 words<\/strong>, including footnotes and references. An abstract<\/strong> of about 100 words is also required, together with up to five keywords<\/strong> and three JEL<\/strong> classifications. Authors should carefully check the conformity of their manuscripts to History of Economic Ideas <\/em>editorial guidelines<\/strong> (see www.historyofeconomicideas.com\/authors.php<\/a>).<\/p>\n The Editorial Committee will select among submitted papers the candidates for the sub-issue; these latter will undergo a process of review by anonymous referees in line with the regular procedures of HEI<\/strong>.<\/p>\n www.historyofeconomicideas.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n SHIFTING BOUNDARIES. Economics in the Crisis and the Challenge of Interdisciplinarity<\/strong><\/p>\n History of Economic Ideas<\/em>, STOREP 2015 Special issue<\/p>\n Shifting Boundaries. New and Old Tendencies in Economics<\/strong> Invited papers<\/em><\/p>\n Economics Imperialism versus Multidisciplinarity<\/strong> The Complex Nature of Economic Liberalism<\/strong> Rationality and Rules: Behavioral Foundations and Policy Implications<\/strong> Is History of Economics What Historians of Economic Thought Do? <\/strong>A Quantitative Investigation<\/strong> Accepted (submitted) papers<\/em><\/p>\n Pareto-efficiency from Pareto to contemporary economics<\/strong> Disciplinary Division of Social Sciences and Methodological Issues in Economic Imperialism and Economic Pluralism from a Critical Naturalist Viewpoint <\/strong> The Politics of Neoclassical Economics: Insights from Foucault\u2019s History of Governmentality <\/strong> Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics and Value Judgments <\/strong> Following a tradition initiated last year with the Torino Conference, selected papers<\/strong> focusing on the main topic of the STOREP 2016 Conference<\/strong> will be published in a sub-issue of History of Economic Ideas.<\/em><\/p>\n The sub-issue will deal with how economies evolve and change through <\/strong>time<\/strong>. Adopting an We therefore invite participants in the conference to submit their papers for the sub-issue<\/strong>. It is to be noted that papers presented at the conference are not per se considered for the sub-issue. Full papers must reach the STOREP 2015 Conference organizing committee (segretario@storep.org<\/a><\/strong>, email subject: \u201cSTOREP 2016 Conference Sub-Issue<\/strong>\u201d) by September 15, 2015<\/strong>.<\/p>\n (Anonymous<\/strong>) papers must be provided in Microsoft word<\/strong> or similar word processor (but not in pdf format); authors must indicate in a separate cover name, affiliation and e-mail address. Articles should be written in standard English<\/strong> (a native English speaker should revise the paper, the case being, before submission) and should not normally exceed 12,000 words<\/strong>, including footnotes and references. An abstract<\/strong> of about 100 words is also required, together with up to five keywords<\/strong> and three JEL<\/strong> classifications. Authors should carefully check the conformity of their manuscripts to History of Economic Ideas <\/em>editorial guidelines<\/strong> (see www.historyofeconomicideas.com\/authors.php<\/a>).<\/p>\n![\"HEI](\"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/HEI-SPECIAL-ISSUE-STOREP-169x300.jpg\")
historical (history-of-ideas) perspective<\/strong>, it wants to investigate, in particular, engines of growth that have received comparatively less attention in the literature, and speculate about how culture, institutions, visions, expectations<\/strong> (growth and development being in times of crisis and more than ever the concern not only of policy-makers and analysts, but of human beings in general) have affected the actual thinking on growth and development<\/strong> and how such thoughts have finally produced an impact on the dynamics of real economies<\/strong>.<\/p>\n![\"Locandina](\"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Locandina-STOREP-2015-Conference-214x300.jpg\")
The STOREP 2015 Conference Special Issue of History of Economic Ideas<\/em><\/strong> (note that, being the first of the series, this issue is larger than the sub-issues that will follow) is currently being finalized, and will appear as Vol. XXIV, n. 2. Below are details about the issue.<\/p>\n
\nM. Cedrini and S. Fiori<\/p>\n
\nJ.B. Davis<\/p>\n
\nA. Kirman<\/p>\n
\nV.J. Vanberg<\/p>\n
\nM.C. Marcuzzo and G. Zacchia<\/p>\n
\nI. Berthonnet<\/p>\n
\nF. Chafim<\/p>\n
\nC. G\u00fcrkan<\/p>\n
\nP. Silvestri[:en]<\/p>\nhistorical (history-of-ideas) perspective<\/strong>, it wants to investigate, in particular, engines of growth that have received comparatively less attention in the literature, and speculate about how culture, institutions, visions, expectations<\/strong> (growth and development being in times of crisis and more than ever the concern not only of policy-makers and analysts, but of human beings in general) have affected the actual thinking on growth and development<\/strong> and how such thoughts have finally produced an impact on the dynamics of real economies<\/strong>.<\/p>\n