{"id":1859,"date":"2016-01-04T14:19:11","date_gmt":"2016-01-04T14:19:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/?p=1859"},"modified":"2016-01-04T14:38:32","modified_gmt":"2016-01-04T14:38:32","slug":"new-storepaper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/new-storepaper\/","title":{"rendered":"New STOREPaper"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[:it]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Un nuovo working paper \u00e8 appena stato pubblicato nella collana degli <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">STOREP<em>apers<\/em><\/span>, ora indicizzata su RePEc (<a href=\"https:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/s\/hpo\/wpaper.html\" target=\"_blank\">clicca qui<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">STOREP<em>apers\u00a0<\/em><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">WP 4 2015<\/span><\/strong><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/WP-4-2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-1786 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Pic-STOREPapers-4-2015-212x300.png\" alt=\"Pic STOREPapers 4 2015\" width=\"212\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Pic-STOREPapers-4-2015-212x300.png 212w, https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Pic-STOREPapers-4-2015-332x470.png 332w, https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Pic-STOREPapers-4-2015.png 441w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 212px) 100vw, 212px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>Maria Cristina MARCUZZO<\/strong> and <strong>Giulia ZACCHIA, \u201cIs History of Economics What Historians of Economic Thought Do? A Quantitative Investigation\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the history of economic thought. Building on previous work (Marcuzzo 2008, 2012), we propose an empirical study in with the aim of describing the dynamics of changes in HET in recent years, detecting three trends: 1) a sort of \u2018stepping down from the shoulders of giants\u2019, namely a move towards studies of \u2018minor\u2019 figures and\/or economists from a more recent past; 2) the blossoming of archival research into unpublished work and correspondence; 3) less theory-laden investigations, connecting intellectual circles, linking characters and events. Using data from Econlit we show the evolution of the overall publication of HET articles (1955-2013) and of HET fully or partially specialized journals (1993-2013); for the latter, by devising proxies which are amenable to quantitative assessment, we demonstrate that there is some evidence to support these claims.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Keywords<\/strong>: History of economic thought; Bibliometrics; Economics journals; History of economics; Quantitative assessment<br \/>\n<strong>JEL<\/strong>: B40, B20, A14<\/p>\n<p>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/WP-4-2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Download<\/strong><\/a>][:en]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A working paper has just been added to the <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">STOREP<em>apers<\/em><\/span> series, which is now indexed on RePEc (<a href=\"https:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/s\/hpo\/wpaper.html\" target=\"_blank\">click here<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">STOREP<em>apers\u00a0<\/em><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">WP 4 2015<\/span><\/strong><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/WP-4-2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-1786 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Pic-STOREPapers-4-2015-212x300.png\" alt=\"Pic STOREPapers 4 2015\" width=\"212\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Pic-STOREPapers-4-2015-212x300.png 212w, https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Pic-STOREPapers-4-2015-332x470.png 332w, https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Pic-STOREPapers-4-2015.png 441w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 212px) 100vw, 212px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>Maria Cristina MARCUZZO<\/strong> and <strong>Giulia ZACCHIA, \u201cIs History of Economics What Historians of Economic Thought Do? A Quantitative Investigation\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the history of economic thought. Building on previous work (Marcuzzo 2008, 2012), we propose an empirical study in with the aim of describing the dynamics of changes in HET in recent years, detecting three trends: 1) a sort of \u2018stepping down from the shoulders of giants\u2019, namely a move towards studies of \u2018minor\u2019 figures and\/or economists from a more recent past; 2) the blossoming of archival research into unpublished work and correspondence; 3) less theory-laden investigations, connecting intellectual circles, linking characters and events. Using data from Econlit we show the evolution of the overall publication of HET articles (1955-2013) and of HET fully or partially specialized journals (1993-2013); for the latter, by devising proxies which are amenable to quantitative assessment, we demonstrate that there is some evidence to support these claims.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Keywords<\/strong>: History of economic thought; Bibliometrics; Economics journals; History of economics; Quantitative assessment<br \/>\n<strong>JEL<\/strong>: B40, B20, A14<\/p>\n<p>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/WP-4-2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Download<\/strong><\/a>][:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[:it] Un nuovo working paper \u00e8 appena stato pubblicato nella collana degli STOREPapers, ora indicizzata su RePEc (clicca qui). STOREPapers\u00a0WP 4 2015 Maria Cristina MARCUZZO and Giulia ZACCHIA, \u201cIs History of Economics What Historians of Economic Thought Do? A Quantitative Investigation\u201d This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the history of economic thought. Building on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":1786,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-storepapers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1859"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1859\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1863,"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1859\/revisions\/1863"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1786"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.storep.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}